|
|
Microsoft Flops and Loses Another 7% of
its Browser Market in 12 Months
Vista Still only used by less than 15% of all users......
|
|
Janco and the IT Productivity Center have just released its
Browser and Operating System Market Share White Paper.
The major findings are that Microsoft's IE browser
market share has continued to erode and has fallen to
58.50% versus 65.48% (loss of 6.96) in August 2007 and
82.99% (loss of 24.49%) in August 2005; Firefox has
maintained its number 2 browser position and now is used
by almost 19% (18.94%) of all users; Google Desktop has
over 4% (4.01%) of the market; and Time-Warner made a
strategic error in abandoning Netscape as users continue
to use Netscape even though AOL no longer supports it.
Read on... |
|
Business
Continuity & Disaster Planning Requirements Defined
Business Continuity and Disaster Planning require data
consistency with the synchronous replication of data
over long-distances and / or journal replication to protect
against local and wide-area disasters. This technology
provides other benefits, including:
-
Maintaining more efficient data currency. Using
synchronous replication over a short distance in a
campus or metropolitan area cluster provides the
highest level of data currency without undue impact
to application performance.
-
Permitting swift recovery. A campus/metropolitan
cluster implementation allows for fast automated
failovers after a local area disaster with minimal
to no transaction loss.
-
Permitting recovery even when a disaster exceeds
traditional regional boundaries. A wide-area
disaster could disable both data centers 1 and 2,
but with some manual interaction, operations can be
shifted to data center 3 and continue after the
disaster.
-
Shifting to staffing outside the disaster area. A
wide-area disaster also affects people located
within the disaster area, both professionally and
personally. By moving operations out of the region
to a remotely located recovery data center,
operational responsibilities shift to people not
directly affected by the disaster.
Janco has defined a Template with a Backup and Backup
Retention policy that is a complete policy which can be
implemented
immediately. The document is provided in both Word 2003
and Word 2007 format and is easily modified. This
policy is included in the Disaster Recovery / Business
Continuity Template.
Below is a table from the policy.
|
Type of Data |
Minimal Backup Policy |
Backup Retention Policy |
|
System software |
Latest Version plus patches
At Least Weekly |
Annual (verified) Backup
Monthly Generations
Weekly Generations |
|
Application software |
Latest Version plus patches
At Least Weekly |
Annual (verified) Backup
Monthly Generations
Weekly Generations |
|
System data |
Daily |
Annual (verified) Backup
Monthly Generations
Weekly Generations
Daily Generations |
|
Application Data |
Daily with real time transaction files |
Annual (verified) Backup
Monthly Generations
Weekly Generations
Daily Generations |
|
Software licenses, encryption keys, &
Protocol Data |
Weekly |
Annual (verified) Backup
Monthly Generations
Weekly Generations |
|
|

|
26% of All Firms Faced Disaster in Last 5 Years |
|
Janco has found that more than a 26% of its client firms
have faced some sort of a disaster over the past five
years. CIOs need to convince executives in their
enterprise to invest in business continuity and disaster
recovery systems. CIO's need to effectively communicate
that business continuity and disaster recovery planning
is not just an insurance policy.
 CIOs know their systems are vulnerable and they want to do
something about it. In these tough economic times, it is
hard to get funding for business continuity and disaster
recovery. CIOs who tie business continuity and disaster
recovery planning to mandated compliance needs are more
successful in obtaining the necessary funding.
Many of these same companies consider disaster recovery
investment as a rolling upgrade that consistently
augments existing infrastructure and application
investments rather than a one-time event that can be
delayed.
In one research study by another firm many CIOs
blamed disasters on non-natural disruptions and
incidents. The data shows that 42% of the firms surveyed
said power failure was the most common cause of
declared disasters and downtime, while 32% cited
hardware failure, and 21% cited network failure.
Read on ....
|
|
| |